[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: debian and cache server(was: debian)
- To: <lug-l@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: debian and cache server(was: debian)
- From: "Tim Carmean" <tecarmea@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 12:13:48 -0500
oh unstable is the only way to go! and i didnt know MTU has a cache. what
is the ip of it so i can add it to my sources. you know what else is fun?
managed switches! especially the one that runs my 2 machine network! check
the stats at:
http://chong.resnet.mtu.edu/mrtg/
yea i dont use a lot of bandwidth heh
tim
tecarmea@xxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven Isaacson" <spisaacs@xxxxxxx>
To: <lug-l@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:01 PM
Subject: debian and cache server(was: debian)
> * Tim Carmean (tecarmea@xxxxxxx) wrote:
> > oh yea debian ROCKS!
>
> But of course it does, running unstable is the best. The packaging
> system rules(.deb, dependencies, and apt).
>
> For all of you apt people out there, if you set up squid on your machine
> you can use my computer(calvin.resnet.mtu.edu) as a sibling. That way if
> I update my unstable before you do at any particular time you should
> automatically grab the deb's from me rather then the internet, or MTU's
> restricted bandwith cache server.
>
> Course that also goes for anyone in general if you so desire. As long as
> you aren't using me as a parent I don't mind.
>
> -steve
> --
> Steven Isaacson <spisaacs@xxxxxxx> http://www.csl.mtu.edu/~spisaacs/
> AIM:spi516 "Need to be proud of what you are..." - Echo Image