Re: [lug-l] September 25 Meeting Minutes

[Brian McPherson <bamcpher@xxxxxxx>]

Don't worry Peter, you're not the first server admin to be removed and you probably won't be the last. It's one of the more public facing jobs, so more people notice if something wasn't done to everyone's liking.

-Brian

On Sep 26, 2012, at 1:48 AM, Peter Marheine <phmarhei@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>> By official vote (100%) Peter Marheine is removed from his position as
>> server administrator for not fulfilling necessary requirements for the
>> position.
>> Constitution needs to be amended to change the server administrator position
>> to a team of people.
> I feel like I was cut out of the loop here, but I don't think "not
> fulfilling necessary requirements" is an accurate statement here (Jake
> professes ignorance of this choice of words, so I'm not sure what to
> think). I believe I've followed the letter of the constitution in
> fulfillment of my duties, so I believe an impeachment vote was
> improper.
> 
> If I take a less hostile approach and assume this is simply the desire
> to spread server duties among several individuals (as I believe has
> been discussed before) with exceedingly poor word choice, I can
> support that move but believe I should have been consulted first.
> 
> Somebody want to clarify? For now I just feel like somebody had an axe
> to grind, but that concept is rather incredible.
> 
> -- 
> Peter Marheine
> Michigan Technological University