Re: IPv6

[Jon DeVree <jadevree@xxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:19:29AM -0400, Michael Moran wrote:
> Well, I disagree with that point.  I don't see any practical reason  
> for the LUG to bother with it.
> 

It gives LUG members a known IPv6 capable host to test their connection
with. Can you name a reason not to add IPv6 to it?

And Mike, don't CC me on replies. The mailing list software is more than
capable of making sure I get replies.
-- 
Jon
"I'm an engineer not a normal person." -Dilbert