Re: IPv6

[Jon Welters <jawelter@xxxxxxx>]

If it's free, and we can impliment it without affecting services I can't
see a reason not to do it. 

Jon

On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 11:34 -0400, Jon Klimowicz wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:19:29AM -0400, Michael Moran wrote:
> >>> Well, I disagree with that point.  I don't see any practical reason
> >>> for the LUG to bother with it.
> >>>
> >>
> >> It gives LUG members a known IPv6 capable host to test their connection
> >> with. Can you name a reason not to add IPv6 to it?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jon
> >> "I'm an engineer not a normal person." -Dilbert
> >
> > I'd have to agree with Jon. I don't see any practical reason to do a lot
> > of things but that doesn't mean they don't
> > get done.
> >
> > --
> > Brian McPherson (Dark-Fx)
> > "There's no place like ::1."
> >
> >
> 
> I see no reason not to get an IPv6 address for the LUG. It would be nice
> to have a known host that I could test with and know that there are IPv6
> services running on.
> 
> -jon (physcofish)
>